Presentation of Slovenian Studies
Teaching Hospital Maribor
Department of Medical Rehabilitation Ljubljanska 5 2000 Maribor
APPLICATION OF THE REPORT – bioresonance therapy in overload syndrome in athletics
The report prepared by:
Breda Jesenšek Papa, PhD. Med.
Prim. Jože Barovič, Dr. med.
Head of Department: Prim.Dr.sci. Zmago Turk, MD. med.
Introduction
Biophysical processes are basic events in each organism, which control the biochemical processes. In the human body, the present electromagnetic oscillations very short to extremely long wavelengths. Body through self-regulation establishes a dynamic equilibrium between the normal physiological variations and pathological bolezenskirni fluctuations. Demolished autoregulation is expressed in a particular disease state. Theoretical basis of operation bioresonance therapy is influencing the electromagnetic oscillations that occur in the body.According to the theory bioresonance therapy restores the body reinforced physiological fluctuations and the inverse pathological as well as the impact on restoring steady. The purpose of the study was to test Bioresonance therapy to athletes with overload syndrome compared with conventional treatments.
The work program
We tested two groups of athletes with overload syndrome (footballers, athletes – sprinters and runners across the barrier). In each group there were 12 athletes;
- the first was treated with conventional physiotherapy (ultrasound sore point, diadynamic currents and cryotherapy), the local uporabijali antirheumatic (Voltaren Gel);
- the second group was treated with Bioresonance therapy (basic program and the program 630, individually adapted according to preliminary testing with Biotensorjem) locally using BRT- oil.
Both groups were advised relief and the suspension of training to the slowdown in the acute symptomatology.Treatment success was evaluated by VAS (visual analogue scale) pain and monitored clinical status.
VAS pain (visual analog scale) is one of the simple one-dimensional scale for measuring pain in medicine is very widely used. Pain is a complex perception otherwise, which is conditioned by experience, but the measurement of subjective perception of pain necessary to assess the effect of therapy and to monitor it. Self Report (personal report) is by subjective evaluation, but in practice it repeatedly tested, easy, fast, and therefore the most commonly used method for measuring pain.
For the measurement using the 10-cm band limited between 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). Patient self-evaluation from 0 to 10 points, so that the subjective assessment of the level of their pain and expressed in numbers (and featured on the centimeter tape) in that it previously explained that 0 means no pain and 10 the worst pain you one could imagine.
methods of work
group 1
treatment with ultrasound, using the following parameters;
frequency of 1 MHz,
IIntenziteta 0.65 W / cm2,
the time duration of 5 – 10 minutes
– 5 times a week.
Diadinamika – we used the CP modulation for 5 minutes and LP modulation for 5 minutes. Cryotherapy were carried out with Kriojet apparatus to 2 minutes locally.
Individual athletes are also home to perform cryotherapy ice under the direction of a physical therapist.
group 2
Bioresonance therapy was performed with BICOM appliance version 4 in VL we gave saliva of subjects in IL while BRT-oil. From the already set program parameters 630 (Terapia-Art H + Di, Freq. Einstellen 114 KHz Wobbeln ein, Versterkung H = 2.5, Di = 26, interval betrieb, Ohne Zeit Stufen 5 minutes) we biotensorjem individually tested amplification H and Di fluctuations and the duration of therapy.
In the first reading we tested amplification H and Di and duration of therapy. In time we wanted to know if it can be prolonged (and this may accelerate treatment). Basic 5-minute program was all doubled and then tested by BT, the deviations were ± 2 minutes. Distribution of the individual athletes was as follows:
| 1. athlete | 10 minutes |
| 2. athlete | 8 minutes |
| 3. athlete | 10 minutes |
| 4. athlete | 12 minutes |
| 5. athlete | 10 minutes |
| 6. athlete | 8 minutes |
| 7. athlete | 12 minutes |
| 8. athlete | 10 minutes |
| 9. athlete | 10 minutes |
| 10. athlete | 8 minutes |
| 11. athlete | 8 minutes |
| 12. athlete | 10 minutes |
For amplification (Die Therapie art H + Di) were according to the individual athletes, afforded the following results:
| athlete | H (2, 5 – standard) | Di (26-standard) |
| 1 | 2.6 | 21 |
| 2 | 2.9 | 18 |
| 3 | 2.5 | 26 |
| 4 | 3.0 | 19 |
| 5 | 2.6 | 19 |
| 6 | 2.9 | 20 |
| 7 | 2.5 | 19 |
| 8 | 2.5 | 22 |
| 9 | 2.4 | 26 |
| 10 | 2.7 | 17 |
| 11 | 2.8 | 21 |
| 12 | 2.6 | 25 |
At each subsequent therapy was inserted pretested parameters and are not re-tested, but we only BT monitored if the program meets.
Basic therapy were selected according to the measurement of conductivity (leitwert messung).
We used the programs 124 to 126:
- 4 125 athletes program,
- 6 athletes program 126,
- 2 Athlete Program 124th
results
Group 1:
| specimen | Visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment | Your score after treatment |
| 1 | 8 | 4 |
| 2 | 7 | 5 |
| 3 | 8 | 6 |
| 4 | 6 | 0 |
| 5 | 6 | 2 |
| 6 | 4 | 0 |
| 7 | 4 | 2 |
| 8 | 3 | 1 |
| 9 | 5 | 1 |
| 10 | 6 | 2 |
| 11 | 5 | 5 |
| 12 | 5 | 4 |
Group 2:
| specimen | Visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment | Your score after treatment |
| 1 | 7 | 2 |
| 2 | 8 | 0 |
| 3 | 6 | 1 |
| 4 | 6 | 0 |
| 5 | 5 | 0 |
| 6 | 4 | 0 |
| 7 | 4 | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | 0 |
| 9 | 4 | 0 |
| 10 | 5 | 1 |
| 11 | 6 | 1 |
| 12 | 7 | 3 |
Assessment of pain before the treatment:
Group 1 VAS before therapy – an average of 5.25 (minimum 3, maximum 8).
Group 2 VAS before therapy – 5.41 (minimum 3, maximum 8).
Rating boleine after treatment:
Group 1 VAS after treatment – 2.6 (minimum 0, maximum 6).
Group 2 after treatment VAS – 0.61 (minimum 0, maximum 3).
Duration of therapy:
1. group – every athlete 12 days (2 times for 5 working days = 10 therapies). The total duration of therapy 12 x 12 days = 144th
second group – 6 x 14 days = 84 days, 3 x 5 days = 15 days, 1 x 3 = 3 days, 2 x 1 = 2 days. Together 104th
Number of treatments:
| group 1 | 12 x 10 = 120 therapies therapies |
| group 2 | 6 x 6 = 36 therapies therapies |
| 3 x 3 = 9 therapy treatments | |
| 1 x 2 = 2 therapy therapy | |
| 2 x 1 = 2 therapy therapy | |
| Total: 49 treatments |
Between the two groups tested, there is a statistically significant difference significant (p <0.05). For all the tested parameters (VAS, duration and number of treatments), which speaks in favor of bioresonance therapy.
debate
Test results are surprising and unequivocal in bioresonance therapy.
To improve the success of treatment in the group with Bioresonance therapy, we need less time, absence for training was shorter. 4 athletes were tested within 12 months after the initial injury and the treatment of the GRT again returned for relapse, but it has been two-fold treated with BRT again successful.
We also stress that we have to test a group of selected active athletes who have relatively frequent injury within the meaning of overload syndrome, which are already before our This time hearing tested various forms of physiotherapy, but also their subjective rating on page bioresonance therapy. We conclude that the use of bioresonance therapy in overuse syndromes successful, easy, harmless and inexpensive method. Its only, hopefully transitional drawback is that falls in an alternative form of treatment, and that by the official medicine (as well as the Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia as a payer) has not yet been officially recognized.